INDEX OF POLICY PAPERS

 

By Author

 

By Number

 

By Date:

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

 

By Topic:

Arab Anti-Semitism

Arafat

Golan

Ideology & Values

Islamic Threat

Israel's Grand Strategic Thinking

Israel's Strategic Alliances

Israel and its Neighbors

Israeli Media

Jewish Pathology

Middle East Arms Escalation

Middle East Defense Expenditures

Middle East Economy

Middle East "Peace Process"

Middle East Terror

Missile Threat

Oslo Accords -
Legal Aspects

Palestinian State

Settlements

Territorial Strategic Assets

Zionist Challenge

 

THE TERRORIST MASQUERADE

Raphael Israeli

Policy Paper No. 132, 2001

Executive Summary

Since the horror committed on September 11th in America, frenzied efforts have been made by the Americans and their Western allies to rally a coalition of Muslim countries that would not only provide bases and intelligence to facilitate the American counter-attack against terrorism, but would also lend legitimacy for attacks against the Muslim perpetrators of that horror, and the Muslim countries that shelter them.

However, courting Muslim partners has proved problematic, for the US has had in the process to compromise its own ideals, by supporting autocratic regimes that have no legitimacy, thus further arousing the hatred of the Muslim people that are oppressed by the “moderate friends” of America, and subscribing to a double standard which denies other democratic countries that fight terrorism, such as India over Kashmir and Israel over the West Bank, the very same prerogatives that America ascribes to herself such as : targeting the terrorists, destroying their bases of support, drying up their funds, using military tactics and hardware etc.

If America had made itself aware of the horrendous barrages of hatred of the West in the Islamic world, and the eruptions of jubilation throughout the Arab and Islamic countries over America’s misfortune on September 11th, on the one hand, and had devised a war against terrorism that took those realities into consideration, then the very focus, goal, means and partners resorted to in that war, and in consequence the efficacy and the results thereof, would have been vastly different, and for the better.