Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fourteen   ■   Number 2 (79)  ■  March 2001   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


The Decline of Israeli Deterrence

Aharon Levran

In recent years, a worrisome phenomenon has been effecting Israel’s national security and specifically its deterrence capability. The diminishing success of Israel and the IDF in wars and “low intensity conflicts”, climaxing in the recent troubling events the IDF’s dishonorable withdrawal from Lebanon and the halfhearted effort to quell the bloody confrontations with the Palestinians in Judea, Samaria and Gaza – indicate that there is a very serious decline in Israel’s deterrence.

Although Israel’s deterrence is still valid with regard to all-out comprehensive wars, as the Arabs haven’t initiated such a war since 1973, its deterrent vis-à-vis “low intensity conflicts” as mentioned above, is almost non-existent. But an effective deterrence capability has always been a central, even pre-eminent cornerstone of Israel’s defense doctrine, given its special circumstances. This stems first and foremost from the quantitative and ethical-conceptual asymmetry, which places Israel in the difficult strategic situation of “the Few versus the hostile Many, as well as from its rough strategic environment in which “might makes right” rules and weakness invites aggression.

Israel needs its deterrent even after the start of the “peace process”, which is hardly worth its name. Without this capability there is no chance in the world that Israel’s enemies will be willing to coexist with it.

The causes of the decline of the deterrence capability are attributed to three factors: the IDF, Israeli leadership and society and Arab perspective. The IDF, due to its diminishing victory curve, is no longer perceived as an invincible army. But more than that, the aversion of Israeli leadership and society to wield its power for a long while now, contribute to the decline of deterrence. When this is combined with Israel’s absences of suitable “staying power”, the miserable shape of its deterrent is evident. No wonder that in such a situation, Sheikh Nasrallah well diagnosed in May 2000 that Israel is as “weak as cobwebs”, with this sentiment being followed by other Arab leaders.

If Israel wants to exist safely and honorably, it must soon rehabilitate its deterrence, and paraphrasing from an outstanding article (which appeared a decade ago and in a different crisis – the Gulf War) – “if there is an IDF – let it appear immediately.”

ACPR Contact usNativ Index