Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Twelve  ■   Number 6 (71)  ■  November 1999   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSES

 


State and Religion in Israel

Why the Separation of State and Religion is Inappropriate for Israel

Shlomo Sharan

Elections to the 15th Knesset in May 1999 once again brought to the forefront of Israel’s political life the problem of the relationship between state and religion.  The ultra-Orthodox Shas party became the 3rd largest political party in Israel, and the newly formed Shinui party, elected on the basis of a narrow and exclusively anti-religious political platform, acquired 6 seats in the Knesset. Shinui, the Left-wing Meretz party and other extra-parliamentary groups, seek the adoption of a constitution that would formerly separate Judaism as a religion from the State of Israel as a secular nation. Such separation, claim the pro-secularist groups, would prevent the concentration of political power in the hands of the ultra-Orthodox parties (Haredim), as well as rectifying conditions created by what the secularists perceive to be coercive and anti-democratic legislation. 

There are many reasons why separation of state and religion is inappropriate for Israel. Among these are:

  1. The Jewish cultural-religious-historical heritage consists of the unfolding of Jewry’s creativity over a period of 3,400 years. It is not identified solely with the Talmud and Midrash. The latter possess enormous breadth and depth, having evolved over an 800-year period (200 B.C.E. to 600 C.E.), but Judaism as the Jewish historical heritage continued to evolve to this very day. This entire heritage, including Zionism, forms the basis of the State of Israel as a Jewish nation. Consequently, separation of Judaism from the State is tantamount to undermining the foundations of Israel.

  2. The social cohesion of Israeli society, reconstituted as a body politic after 19 centuries of exile by Jews from all over the globe, depends upon Jewry’s identity as a distinct historical-religious-ethnic-national entity. Removal of any of these elements by shortsighted legislation could destroy the internal fabric of Israeli society and seriously weaken its ties to Diaspora Jewry.

  3. Separation of state and religion would not eradicate the antagonism between the two militant poles, secularist and Haredi, of Israeli society. That conflict can be alleviated only through a long process of political compromise and visionary leadership.

  4. 4. Israel is only one of many ethnic democracies (such as Finland, Norway, Korea, etc. etc), that have one ethnic majority and one or several minorities that do not share ownership of the national territory. Israel’s identity as a Jewish nation is no less democratic than any other of these countries. Almost all of the ethnic democracies also have an official state religion, just as Judaism is the official national religion of Israel. An official state religion, along with a dominant ethnic majority, are fundamental features of many democratic nations.

Finally, Israel Jewry is urged to undertake a profound reconstruction of its cultural-religious life. The goals are to promote a higher level of awareness regarding Jewry’s historical-religious heritage among Israel’s Jewish citizens, and to make it possible for all major Jewish subgroups, that are devoted to promoting Jewish historical continuity, to identify with the State of Israel.

Home Contact us