INDEX OF POLICY PAPERS

 

By Author

 

By Number

 

By Date:

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

 

By Topic:

Arab Anti-Semitism

Arafat

Golan

Ideology & Values

Islamic Threat

Israel's Grand Strategic Thinking

Israel's Strategic Alliances

Israel and its Neighbors

Israeli Media

Jewish Pathology

Middle East Arms Escalation

Middle East Defense Expenditures

Middle East Economy

Middle East "Peace Process"

Middle East Terror

Missile Threat

Oslo Accords -
Legal Aspects

Palestinian State

Settlements

Territorial Strategic Assets

Zionist Challenge

RELIGIOUS, CULTURAL AND RHETORICAL ASPECTS IN PALESTINIAN STRATEGY

Mordechai Nisan

Policy Paper No. 81, from the book
ISRAEL AND A PALESTINIAN STATE:
ZERO SUM GAME?,  2001

Executive Summary

The Palestinian struggle against Israel is a political-cum-military campaign rooted in the culture-code of a particular community and civilization. Thus, the public and visible Israeli-Palestinian diplomatic process provides only an external exposure of a concealed and complex array of Islamic notions and precedents, cultural characteristics of the Muslim East, and rhetorical devices suited to a revolutionary Palestinian idiom. The Palestinians seek victory, not peace, in this long and brutal fight against the Jews and the State of Israel.

There is no foundation for mutual and satisfactory Israel-PLO accommodation inasmuch as Palestinism is diametrically opposed to Zionism, just like Western democracy is juxtaposed to Muslim tyranny. Such generalized cultural and political factors derive from the specific history and mentality of the Palestinians as Oriental Muslims and Arabs. With absolute Islamic faith, endurance and extremism as indelible features of character and politics, the Palestinians are unable and unwilling to accept the legitimacy and viability of a Jewish state in "Palestine".

This is a zero-sum game but one that is driven not only by modern nationalist ideology and contemporary political grievances, but by a durable ancient memory, identity, and lexicon. As such, the PLO demand for a state is no more than a rhetorical mantra for the more fundamental demand for the annihilation of Israel and its Jews. This is the way to understand the incompatibility between Israel and the PLO, the gravity of the Palestinian menace to Israel, and the need for a radical re-evaluation of the necessary Israeli policy response.

For the complete article (in English), click here.