Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fifteen   ■   Number 6 (89)  ■  November 2002   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


WMD in the Hands of Muslim Despots

Editorial

It is sufficient for one cubic centimeter of anthrax germs, which has  penetrated the ventilation system of a large concert hall, to annihilate thousands of patrons within forty-eight hours. The infusion of one liter of botulinum, one of the deadliest toxins in nature, into the water sources of a metropolis such as New York would probably cause the death of millions. In extreme contrast to nuclear development, which costs billions of dollars related to acquiring uranium from outside elements, and requires a scientific infrastructure that generally is not available to Third World countries, chemical and biological weaponry is available, cheap, and no less deadly. The kill ratio of 30 liters of an anthrax germ solution is equal in value to a nuclear explosion of 20 kilotons such as used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Thus, with the end of the Cold War, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the removal of the threat of “mutually assured destruction” (MAD), not only did the “end of history”, in the naive formulation of Frances Fukuyama, fail to transpire, but in fact the potential increased of an incomparably greater danger – the danger of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of Muslim civilization. This is indeed a “clash of civilizations” as Samuel Huntington aptly defined it. Islam, which has characteristics of Nazism, is more dangerous than either the Nazi terror or the Communist evil, since it does not draw its spiritual sustenance from a passing ideology but rather from the principles of jihad, which it derives from the categorical imperative of the Qur`an. Devoid of any traces of morality, it sanctifies murder for its own sake with cries of “Allah is mighty!” It now has the tools to implement its evil designs. 

It is, indeed, an entire civilization encompassing every fifth person in this world, and it makes no difference whether he is a shahid on the altar of Islamic fundamentalism, bin- Laden-style, or a “hero of the revolution” of the socialist Ba`ath Party of Saddam Hussein; a serial-killer from Arafat’s Fatah or a “human bomb” of the Hamas kind.

The Americans understood this well on September 11, 2001, when no fewer than fifteen murderers out of the nineteen were Saudis – their “allies” – and, concurrently, Iraq’s buildup of weapons of mass destruction has been approaching the level of critical mass.

Yet Iraq is only the tip of the iceberg. Egypt and Libya do not lag far behind Saddam Hussein; nor do Syria and Iran. The Muslim core developments radiate out in their impact to potential allies such as North Korea, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.

Defeatism is a built-in liability of democracies that has characterized the past one hundred years. George Santayana’s familiar maxim that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” is once again fulfilling itself before our eyes. Again, as in the past, it is France that stands at the forefront of the “peace camp”, the defeatists, the greedy, the anti-Semites. In partnership with it is Germany. The two (funded by Swiss banks) are the main exporters of components of weapons of mass destruction to the dictatorships of the Middle East.

Thus the determination of President Bush, who has the wide support of the American public, to uproot the regime of Saddam Hussein, is a source of wonder and hope. Eliminating Hussein means much more than removing a habitual criminal. Stripping Iraq of weapons of mass destruction will be a warning signal to Damascus, Cairo, Teheran, and Tripoli.

What for the United States is a long-term strategic calculation is for Israel an existential necessity. The Jewish state is not exactly a superpower that stretches over half a continent on the other side of the planet, and it does not have an army of two million equipped with the best of strategic systems. Israel is a microstate surrounded by enemies that are sworn to its destruction, who are hundreds of times larger in territory and population. The destruction of the regime in Baghdad and the neutralization of the Iraqi threat therefore constitute additional very important elements in ensuring its survival.

ACPR Contact usNativ IndexNativ in Hebrew