Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fourteen   ■   Number 3 (80)  ■  June 2001   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


The Politics of Oblivion and Brain-Permeability:
The Israeli Left

David Bukay

The article deals with the very odd and peculiar phenomenon of the Israeli Left, who behave as if they see nothing but peace and harmony between Israelis and Palestinians, provided that Israel retreats to the 1967 borders. They believe that redemption lies behind the door, and ignore the cruel and harsh reality, the killings, violence, and the uprising. They do not pay the least attention to the Palestinians’ declarations and especially the Palestinians’ actions. They believe, wholeheartedly, that peace now is not the only available alternative, but it can be reached. This is a pure and classic example of the “mirror image”: You look at your rival, and imagine you see yourself through the mirror.

There are three types of Israeli Left: the opportunistic hedonists who trade peace as a business. In this type we specifically find politicians. The second type is peace as a religion, as an intoxicating belief. In this we find intellectuals combined with the “Peace Now” group. The third type is peace as a total ideology. In this we find the “Post-Zionist” group combined with other radical Leftists.

The common denominator of the three types is that they are only a salon Left and fashion derived, part of the social “bon-ton”. They have nothing to do with the socialist Left of Europe, east and west, and of course nothing t do with the radical Left revolutionary ideology. They belong to the middle and upper class in Israel, to the “North Tel Aviv State”.

The problem is they have almost total dominance of the media, both the electronic and the press, and these determine the public agenda in Israel. They “breed” themselves into these positions, and almost block out other opinions.

This is the reason why their failure was revealed significantly through the demise and collapse of the Oslo accords. The Palestinians demand not only the retreat to the 1967 borders, according to the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 (of which they were not a part!), but the fulfillment of the United Nations Assembly decision 194 (“the Right of Return”). And from 1998, they have raised up the demand that Israel’s borders, after the implementation of United Nations Assembly decision 194, should be within the Partition Plan, of November 29, 1947 (United Nations Assembly decision 181).

ACPR Contact usNativ Index