Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fourteen   ■   Number 2 (79)  ■  March 2001   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


Bill Clinton:
“Israel’s Greatest Friend in the White House”

Ezra Sohar

No mention of a Palestinian state was made in the Oslo Accords of 1993. Though Peres spoke of it after Rabin’s death, Netanyahu informed Clinton of his unequivocal opposition. In 1998, the President’s wife said that she supported the establishment of a Palestinian state. In September of that year, Clinton visited Gaza. His statements there constituted de-facto recognition of the Palestinian state. The gathering in Gaza was not a formal meeting of the Palestinian National Council and therefore lacked the authority to repeal the Palestinian Covenant. Nevertheless, Clinton declared that it was abrogated and the Israeli government was compelled to acquiesce. In fact, he and his assistants supported the PLO from the beginning of his term. He at no point insisted that Arafat implement the commitments which he assumed: to halt the incitement in the schools, to reduce the number of “police”, to put a stop to the smuggling of arms into the Authority territories, etc. In July 1999, Clinton asserted that Palestinians “could live anywhere in Israel”, and in doing so, disclosed his support for the Palestinian right of return. He even reported to the Congress that Arafat stood in compliance with all of his commitments.

He allowed Sadaam Hussein to develop weapons of mass destruction and, for all intents and purposes, appointed Mubarak the local sheriff and forced Israel to “consult with him as if he were an unbiased bystander”. He also established an army of 650,000 soldiers equipped with the most sophisticated American weapons in Egypt.

He appointed a long line of Jews to assist him led by Sandy (Samuel) Berger – a member of “Breira” and “Peace Now” – widely considered to be the brains behind the government during Clinton’s second term.

Clinton hinted at his attitude towards Jerusalem when his ambassador, Martin Indyk, refused to participate in the celebration of Jerusalem’s 3000th anniversary. Eventually, at the Taba meetings, he suggested the division of the city.

He significantly deepened US involvement in Israel, which led to an increase in Israel’s dependence on America. He bolstered the status of the CIA – in addition to all of its previous activities including providing PLO members with weapons training. And finally, he made promises to Netanyahu and Barak which he ultimately failed to keep.

ACPR Contact usNativ Index