Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fourteen   ■   Number 2 (79)  ■  March 2001   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


His Sacrilegious Heart
A Response to Yigal Elam

Martin Sherman

Yigal Elam’s response to the ACPR position paper detailing the dangers inherent in the Oslo process and its derivatives is a rare mixture of defamatory dogma and ignominious ignorance, heavily spiced with the impudent arrogance of the self-proclaimed righteous.  Elam begins his tirade by a priori disqualifying the validity of his political opponents’ position without providing any substantial rationale or factual evidence to back up his position. He attempts to repudiate the positions set out by the ACPR paper by pompously claiming a monopoly on political wisdom and moral probity for his own curious blend of appeasement and self-contradictory national effacement.  Thus Elam heaps abuse on those who would assertively defend Jewish nationalism, yet apparently views with great favor concessions to foster Palestinian nationalism. He purports to speak in the name of enlightened democratic values yet suggests that promoting them requires acquiescing to the demands of the most tyrannical elements on the face of the planet who represent the very antithesis of the values he allegedly cherishes. Throughout his rambling diatribe, Elam eschews, with admirable consistency, any semblance of an attempt to present reasoned arguments or accurate data in order to refute the reasoned arguments and factual data presented in the ACPR analysis. Instead he tries to intimidate the reader and with a torrent of bullying, unfounded and disingenuous invective in the hope that this will somehow undermine his opponents’ positions. Is this the best that the Israeli “left” can muster??

ACPR Contact usNativ Index