Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Fourteen   ■   Number 2 (79)  ■  March 2001   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


The US, Israel & Oil

Irving Kett

The article addresses the following 4 topics:

  1. The strategic importance of the Middle East by virtue of its geographical location and critical water passages for world trade. While historically the Suez Canal and especially the Turkish straits were the most important waterways in the eastern Mediterannean, today the water passages that are most crucial in the Middle East are further east, namely in the Persian Gulf and the Straits of  Hormuz.
     

  2. The Middle East has emerged as the leading petroleum and natural gas producing region in the world. It futhermore possesses something like 2/3 of the world’s proven petroleum reserves. Despite its prodigious and continuously daily output, the proven reserves of Middle East petroleum and natural gas is still rising. Petroleum  products today are the single most valuable commodity in international commerce. An assured supply of ME petroleum is, therefore, not only of vital interest to the US in time of war, but also in time of peace.
     

  3. 3.   US interest in maintaining Israel’s independence has constituted an important element in US policy toward the ME for many decades. Nevertheless, concern for Israel in policymaking circles, has vacillated between the extremes of maximum support to one of advocating virtual abandonment. Since the demise of the USSR and the Camp David accords of 1978, it is questionable whether Israel can continue to be considered an important strategic asset of the US in the new ME.

    The abandonment of a truncated, increasingly vulnerable Israel, becomes an evermore attractive option for the US.
     

  4. There are two lines of thought with respect to the ME battlefield in the 21st Century. One emphasizes high-tech weapons; the other places greater importance upon well-trained, highly-motivated fighters, prepared to engage the enemy at close quarters, and willing to accept whatever casualties are necessary to gain their ideological and military objectives. Indications are that determined enemy forces of the latter type, employing protracted terrorist and guerilla tactics, are the blueprints for future ME conflicts, of which there will probably be many.

The strategic importance, coupled with a history of almost continued crises, requires the US to consider the ME as a crucial factor in formulating worldwide economic and military strategy.

ACPR Contact usNativ Index