Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Thirteen  ■   Number 3 (74)  ■  June 2000   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


Israeli Cinema:
The Collapse of the Frameworks of Cultural Sanity

Aharon Dolev

Israeli cinema, at the start of the millennium, represents a unique cultural phenomenon: a cinema without an audience, indifferent or even derisive toward its viewers; rewarded with indifference or even derision by the audience. A cinema that is seventy years old yet still in a static, fetal state, not yet having begun to internalize the first principles of this medium's unique language and idioms within the family of the arts. Fixated on one enterprise – the writing of the Zionist narrative according to the doctrines of Israel's "new historians" – the Israeli screen is constantly inundated with imitative universalist moralism of a harsh and narrow bent – that is to say, inundated with Zionist exorcism rituals, which are repeated ad nauseam in film after film. Sequestered and neglectful of the passage of time, Israeli cinema entraps itself in folly, in a dead-end without egress or remedy – in meagerness of material and of talent, an aesthetic void, technical-artistic impoverishment, stillborn narrative. Indeed, few will dispute the lack of an Israeli cinema worthy of the name and its lack of influence on the shaping and development of Israeli cultural life. Militant leftism in Israel is, of course, the guiding inspiration and reigning authority of the celluloid industry that by an unfortunate misnomer is referred to as "Israeli cinema", and its ongoing wretchedness can be debited to the leftist dogma of self-recrimination. If there were any viewers at all, it might be possible to sum up a few score years of Israeli cinematic activity as a protracted treading in shallow waters. Even if the post-Zionist dogma has not delivered a terminal cultural blow to the Israeli cinema, most likely it has greatly diminished its chances to recover, or to transcend narrow and dilettantish provincialism and enter the realm of autonomous cinematic creativity. Thus, in light of its cinematic vacuity and its effects, how may one sum up the damages of Israeli film's negative cultural contribution? Perhaps as part of the symptoms of a real threat to democratic society and culture in Israel?

ACPR Contact usNativ Index