Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Twelve   ■   Number 3 (68)  ■  May 1999   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


To a Sliver of Land Without Oil

George Steiner

Babylon, Thebes, Carthage are archaeology.  Modern Athens is a travesty of an unredeemable past.  The laws, the epigraphy of Imperial Rome turn up in the desert.  Israel relives; the Diaspora, notably in North America, is animate with creative force and a lust for renewal...Jews insist on existing contra the norm and logic of history, which, even barring genocide, are those of gradual melting, assimilation, cross-breeding and the effacement of original identity...The Jew has been chosen and branded for eternity.  If he was to perish from this earth, God's truth and declared intent, the revelation of monotheism and of morality on Sinai, would be falsified.

Has the survival of the Jew been worth the appalling cost?  Would it not be preferable, on the balance sheet of human mercies, if he was to ebb into assimilation and the common seas?  Every Jewish father is, at some point in his life and paternity, an Abraham to an Isaac on the unspeakable three-day journey to Mount Moriah.  When he begets a child, a Jew knows that he may be bestowing on that child the inheritance of terror, of a sadistic destiny.

It may be that the Jew in the Diaspora survives in order to be a guest – so terribly unwelcome still at so many shut doors.  Intrusion may be our calling, so as to suggest to our fellow men and women at large that all human beings must learn how to live as each other's "guests-in-life".  Morality must always have its bags packed.  This has been the universalist precept of the prophets, of Isaiah, Deutero-Isaiah and Jeremiah in their ancient quarrel with the kings and priests of the fixed nation, of the fortress-state.  Today this polemic underlies the tensions between Israel and the Diaspora.  Though the thought must, like the ritual name of God, be unspeakable, the greater verity is that Judaism would survive the ruin of the State of Israel.  It would do so if its "election" is indeed one of wandering, of the teaching of welcome among men.

It is not the "slaying of God in the person of his son", whatever that macabre phantasm is taken to signify – which is fundamental to the detestation of the Jew.  It is the narrative "creation", "invention", "definition", "revaluation" of God in Jewish monotheism and its ethics.  It is not as killer but as "begetter" of God that the Jew is unforgiven.

Three times, in Western history, the Jew has striven to confront human consciousness with the concept of the one God and the moral-normative consequences of that concept. 

The moral dictates which emanate from Sinaitic and prophetic monotheism are uncompromising...They entail the mutation of the common man.  We are to discipline soul and flesh into perfection.

The second comes with the Sermon on the Mount.  Nearly inconceivably against the human grain is Jesus' bidding that we offer the other cheek, that we forgive our enemy and persecutor – no, that we learn to love him.

The third is that of utopian socialism, notably in its Marxist guise.  Marxism is Judaism's other principal heresy.  Marxism demands a complete inversion of the priorities of privacy, of acquisition, of egoism.  We are to abstain from superfluity, to share and share alike, to invest the resources, the ambitions of the self in the anonymity of the collective.

ACPR Contact usNativ Index