Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Twelve   ■   Number 2 (67)  ■  March 1999   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


In Defense of a Despised Profession

Dov Landau

A society that does not inculcate solid and unifying values in its youth, disintegrates and becomes violent, perhaps even suicidal.  It is therefore incumbent upon education in general, and on teachers in particular, not only to impart knowledge and skills to students, but also to teach and educate the younger generation in the values of the past that have stood the test of time.

Regretfully, our society and school system invite obstructive tactics that prevent the teacher from carrying out such objectives.  Students today become increasingly aware of the individualistic conceptions that promote absolute freedom and equality, even relative to parents and teachers.  Many parents can no longer cope with this situation, so either they raise their hands in despair, or they become violent, or they transfer the problem to the teacher's doorstep, where they stand united with their children.  As a result, the school system has lost control of disciplining the student to the extent that it has become practically impossible to teach, let alone to educate.  In general, parents and principals alike have accepted the ideas of counterfeit pluralism, freedom and equality, while the teacher stands alone "in the forefront of the hottest battle" (Samuel II 11:15).

The lack of discipline and the violence of the students have turned into a real physical danger to students as well as teachers in both formal and informal educational frameworks.  Consequently, no teacher can ensure the safety of the 40-80 students usually in his charge.  Under such circumstances, parents, students and principals become materialistic, interested primarily in professions that promise a high income.  Computers and electronic equipment have made students spiritually passive and distanced from humanistic and Jewish culture.  The economic perspective has turned parents, students and principals into a consumer society that views education as a supplier of goods in exchange for payment, and then justifies the recipient's interference in details of educational activities and teaching to the degree of demanding the right to determine their own grades.  The development of research and the blind trust in it have turned schools into experimental stations that have lost any inclination toward a continuous, planned, graduated educational process.  Despair of formal education has brought about a blind acceptance of informal education, till school is often an informal educational framework, or an amusement park of education and teaching.

In such an atmosphere, in which all forms of constraint or restraint of students are forbidden, the teacher remains with his hands tied, unable to enforce even minimum discipline.  His situation is like that of our ancestors in Egypt who cried out:  "There is no straw given to thy servants and they say to us 'make bricks'" (Exodus 5:16).  A society that demands output and achievements from its teachers, yet prevents them from using the means to accomplish such goals, is a hypocritical, corrupt society that has only itself to blame for the faults in the school system.  In short, it is neither the schools nor the teachers that have to change, but the society that has to admit its guilt and act to reform itself, even if this means a return to religion and its values.  It is preferable to do so today, than to wait until the situation has become even more critical.

ACPR Contact usNativ Index