Ariel Center for
Policy Research

A JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND THE ARTS

 

NATIV   ■   Volume Eleven   ■   Number 4-5 (63-64) ■  September 1998   ■  Ariel Center for Policy Research

 

SYNOPSIS

 


Who is Really Guilty of Failing to Prevent
the Prime Minister's Murder?

Eliav Shochetman

Among the central questions that arose in the wake of the murder of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin were:  Could something have been done to prevent the murder?  Was there someone who knew of Yigal Amir's murder plans who did not report this to the proper authorities, as required by law?  The State Prosecutor decided to charge Margalit Har-Shefi with a violation of paragraph 262 of the Criminal Code of 5736-1977 (Failure to Prevent a Crime), and the court decided to convict her, yet this conviction is not enough to easily answer the above question, since the convicted party never admitted to knowing of the planned murder, and she also was not convicted of any other violation that would signal her criminal involvement in the murder of the Prime Minister.  According to the legal tradition in Israel, no one has ever been convicted of failure to prevent a crime without admitting to the fact, and Margalit Har-Shefi's conviction was based solely on assessments.  Another weak point in the legal judgement was that the heads of the General Security Services had in their hands the very same information as did the guilty party regarding the statements of Yigal Amir, and on the basis of such information they were not able to predict in advance the events of the murder.  How was Margalit Har-Shefi supposed to know what the heads of the GSS were not able to know, even though they had the same information in hand?!  Despite the conviction of Margalit Har-Shefi, the heavens cry out over the failure to bring to trial the GSS agent Avishai Raviv, who specifically admitted that Yigal Amir told him of his intention to kill the Prime Minister and, according to him, he took these words seriously.  If Raviv knew about this in advance, it is likely that this matter was known to his handlers in the GSS.  The Attorney General should order a police investigation and the opening of legal proceedings against everyone who knew of the plans for the murder and failed to do what was required to prevent it.  Even if this should involve a secret body such as the GSS, the principles of the rule of law require the undertaking of such an investigation and the initiation of all the necessary legal steps in order that the truth in this matter will come to light.

Home Contact us