Prime Minister Olmert’s visit to West
Europe has reaffirmed the central role of Demographobia – the irrational
fear of Palestinian demography – in determining Israel’s permanent
boundaries, in spite of the gross errors underlying the demographic scare.
For example, Israel’s Jewish population growth has exceeded Arab population
growth in Judea & Samaria (2.1% vs. 1.8% during 1997-2004). Moreover, the
Muslim fertility rate, within the Green Line, has declined dramatically from
9.23 children per woman in 1960/64 to 4.63 in 2004, while the Arab fertility
rate (including Druze and Christian Arabs) has declined to 4 children per
woman.
The Prime Minister has reiterated his
position that a retreat from geography is a prerequisite for saving Jewish
demography. His determination to withdraw from the mountain ridges of Judea
& Samaria – which, in his opinion, possess a unique historical and security
added value – has not reflected a cave-in to Palestinian terrorism and/or US
pressure. Prime Minister Olmert has demonstrated his capability to defy
terror and pressure during the general election of 1996 and 2001 (when he
supported victorious Netanyahu and Sharon, the hawkish candidates) and
during his own mayoral campaigns in Jerusalem. However, currently, he
intends to retreat under the influence of Demographic Fatalism, which has
been nurtured by severely erroneous 1998-2015 Palestinian demographic
projections. These projections have been embraced, without examination, by
Israel’s demographic establishment. They have spearheaded an intensive
effort to instill demography-driven faintheartedness in the minds of
Israel’s policy-makers and the public at-large. In contrast, Gallup’s March
17, 2006 survey of Jewish and Arab fertility rate preferences concluded that
“Green Line” Jewish and Arab fertility preferences are equal at 3.7 children
per woman, while East Jerusalem Arabs and Judea & Samaria Arabs prefer 4.1
and 4.5 (and declining) respectively. Gallup indicated that actual fertility
tends to converge with fertility preference.
Prime Minister Olmert is convinced that
time works against Jewish demography, and that Jews are doomed to become a
minority between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. Therefore, in his
mind, demographic considerations supersede geographic and topographic
(security) considerations in the equation of Israel’s national security and
in determining the future of Judea & Samaria. Thus, Demographobia, which
never penetrated the mind of Jewish leaders, when Jews constituted a
minority of 8% (1900 – Herzl) or 33% (1947 – Ben Gurion) west of the Jordan
River, dominates the mind of Israel’s current leadership, in spite of the
fact that Jews have been a 60% majority (67% without Gaza) during the last
45 years.
Contrary to Demographic Fatalism, there
is a demographic problem, but there is no machete at the throat of the
durable Jewish majority, which benefits from a robust demographic momentum.
For instance, the annual number of “Green Line” Jewish births has increased
from 80,400 in 1995 to 105,181 in 2005, while “Green Line” Arab births have
stagnated during the same period at around 40,000, with a drop to 36,000 per
year during the first few months of 2006. The Jewish Demographic Momentum is
further bolstered by the net annual positive migration (Aliya + returning
Israelis-emigrant Israelis) of 20,000 since 2001. These developments have
been ignored by Israel’s “Prophets of Demographic Doom”, who have
consistently employed yesterday’s outdated demographic indicators as a basis
for tomorrow’s projections, thus exacerbating their errors.
Documented births, deaths and migration
have refuted – annually – the projections made by the Palestinian Central
Bureau of Statistics and by Israel’s “Prophets of Demographic Doom”.
Demographic reality has vindicated Zionist leaders, who persisted in their
attempt to establish the Jewish State, in face of
seemingly-insurmountable-adverse security, economic and demographic odds.
Certainly, there is no reason for Demographobia at a time when a critical
Jewish majority has been attained between the Jordan River and the
Mediterranean, bolstered by unparalleled military, economic, financial,
technological and educational achievements. Demographic growth provides no
reason to sacrifice critical strategic assets on the altar of a bogus
demographic scare.
The OpEd is based, largely, on a breakthrough American-Israeli study, led by
Bennett Zimmerman of L.A. (Yoram Ettinger is the head of the Israeli
contingency), which was published in February 2006 by the Begin-Sadat Center
for Strategic Studies (www.biu.ac.il/Besa/MSPS65.pdf).
More data on the study and be retrieved at
www.pademographics.com.